Posted on
April 28, 2010 by
BirthingBeautifulIdeas
Dear Taffy Brodesser-Akner,
Last night, I read the piece you wrote in the LA Times about “weighing the risks and rewards of vaginal birth after cesarean.”
I’ll admit–at first, I was a little perplexed by what you wrote.
Actually, there were times when I was even angry. And then sympathetic. And then perplexed all over again.
You see, I’m not sure that I’m all that comfortable with the roles that fear and pessimism played in your article.
It’s not that I would have wanted you to hide your fear and pessimism over your choice to attempt a VBAC. These feelings are yours. You own them. You should not be expected to ignore them.
In fact, I think we do a disservice to any birthing woman when we tell her to obscure any negative feelings she has about birth, sweep them all under the rug, and just hope that they don’t pop up in the middle of labor.
But Taffy, you presented your fears and pessimism in a way that made it all too easy for those feelings to be exacerbated in or even transferred to other women considering VBAC. You presented them in a way that may have even misinformed women about their birth options. And that doesn’t seem to be offering any benefits to other birthing women either.
It all began with the tag line:
She knew the statistics about vaginal birth after a c-section, that only about 60% to 80% who try for a VBAC actually have one. But she also knew that when the time came, she’d just have to decide for herself.
Now, I know that you probably weren’t responsible for writing this tag line. Nonetheless, I still think that it accurately captures some of what you describe in your “first person” account of your decision to attempt a VBAC.
But does it accurately capture VBAC itself?
Considering that 67.7% of all women who try for a vaginal birth in the United States will actually have one–and this statistic includes women who do not have prior cesarean scars–is it truly fair to claim that only 60% to 80% of women who try for a VBAC actually have one?
In other words, the overall chance of having a vaginal birth after cesarean is very similar to the overall chance of having a vaginal birth after any labor. This should leave less room for pessimism about VBAC–not more!
Of course, my sympathetic side knows that the fear and pessimism isn’t just about these numbers. In fact, before my VBAC, I felt and faced those fears–not just the fear of uterine rupture, but the fear of feeling like a failure if I had a repeat cesarean, or of just ending up with a repeat cesarean period.
And we are not alone in experiencing these fears.
But I knew too that signing up for an elective repeat cesarean would give me a 100% chance of “ending up” with a c-section. And I knew deep inside that ending up with a repeat cesarean would not make me a failure. And I knew that based on my research, my values, and my preferences, I wanted a VBAC.
So I opted for the 20% – 40% chance of a repeat cesarean (rather than the 100% chance).
Speaking of chances, you seemed to characterize the desire to VBAC as simply the desire to have a chance to have a trial of labor after cesarean (or TOLAC). You said that those of us who want or have wanted a VBAC simply wanted to “give it a shot.”
Taffy, for many of us, it is so much more than giving labor a shot.
Some of us want to give the benefits of labor a shot.
Some of us don’t want to give the risks of elective repeat cesarean a shot.
Most (if not all) of us want to give informed consent a shot.
Just like women who choose (and are not coerced into) an elective repeat cesarean–we want to give our decisions, our weighing of the risks and benefits of VBAC and repeat cesarean, a shot.
And in weighing those risks and benefits, it is impossible not to consider the risk of uterine rupture during a VBAC. This is the extra risk that a cesarean scar gives us, and this risk is present regardless of whether we opt for a VBAC or an elective repeat cesarean.
And yes, the risk is greater for those of us who opt for a VBAC. It’s an approximately .7% risk for women with one prior low-transverse scar–not 1%, as you stated. And of those uterine ruptures, approximately 6% lead to a fetal or neonatal death. This means that approximately .04% of all VBACs will result in a uterine rupture-related infant death. Correlatively, this means 99.96% of all VBACs will not end in a uterine rupture-related infant death.
And to the physician who told you that the risk of uterine rupture is “100% when it’s happening to you,” please know that this person was essentially comparing apples to orange spaceships. To reiterate, the statistical risk of a uterine rupture is approximately .7% for all women seeking VBAC with one low-transverse scar. If a woman experiences a uterine rupture during a VBAC, her experience represents that statistic. She is not a statistic. Her baby is not a statistic. Her personal experience is not a statistic. And this is why she may feel emotionally like the statistic is 100% for her.
But mathematically, statistically, and realistically, this is not the case.
In my mind, this means that women seeking a VBAC should have a healthy fear–or at least an awareness–of uterine rupture and its signs and symptoms. But the exceedingly low absolute risk itself shouldn’t convey an overall sense of pessimism about VBAC.
Similarly, the risks of c-section shouldn’t convey an overall sense of pessimism about this birth option. But this doesn’t mean that we should gloss over or pooh-pooh these risks, as you seemed to in your article.
Repeat cesareans–especially third and fourth cesareans–also carry risks, and even serious and life-threatening risks. The risk of placenta accreta–a complication that can lead to severe blood loss, hysterectomy, or even maternal death–increases from .31% in a second c-section to .57% in a third c-section to 2.13% in a fourth c-section. Similarly, the rates of hysterectomy and blood transfusion increase with each subsequent cesarean section.
But through all of this risk/benefit analysis and weighing, I do see what you want.
I do understand what is driving a lot of your fear.
For you state that you just want someone to tell you “which option will give [you], with the least amount of intervention, the reasonable guarantee of a healthy child and a healthy [you].”
Oh Taffy, how I wish that every woman and child could have that guarantee!
And there’s nothing like being a parent to make you want to eliminate any and all risk from being born–from living.
But we can’t eliminate these risks. None of us can. Not even those of us without cesarean scars. Not those of us who are first-time moms or seventh-time moms. Not those of us who opt for vaginal births or cesarean sections. Not those of us who birth in the hospital or in a birth center or at home.
It’s scary. It’s daunting. It can even be debilitating for some of us at times.
Taffy, what I don’t want for you is to obscure your fears. Acknowledge them, accept them, and own them.
But I also want you to give birth with confidence.
I want you to start seeking information that will increase your confidence in your birth. And you don’t have to continue looking up statistical data to do this.
There are books (like Birthing from Within: An Extra-Ordinary Guide to Childbirth Preparation
). There are blogs. There are websites. There are advocacy organizations.
There are women–other mothers who have had VBACs, other mothers who have had repeat cesareans–who can provide mother-to-mother support to you on your journey.
But please–so that other women can go forth on their birthing journeys with confidence too–try not to allow your fear to infect other women. Please do not present the “facts” about VBAC with fear and pessimism.
We all deserve a bit better than that.
You do too.
With warm wishes for a safe, happy, and healthy birth,
Kristen
Share